Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kay-El's avatar

I enjoy reading your thoughts regardless whether I agree or not. Always food for thought. I think the answer lies somewhere in between all these points you and others have brought up. It wasn’t just one thing, it was a whole smorgasbord of shit, plus amnesia about how great Trump 1.0 was(n’t). This explains to me at least why so many Dems won their down ballot races even though Trump won the presidency.

Expand full comment
DR Darke's avatar

::the US is a center Right electorate::

Here's where I part company with you—or suggest a different interpretation, or something.

I've long felt, and firmly believe, that the one person who can crush Trumpism utterly is Bernie Sanders, who is even more populist than Donald Trump is, and is a pro-labor Leftist to boot. When he talks about income inequality he's not spinning fairy tales about bringing coal or oil jobs back to America—he's talking about working-class Americans taking new jobs with roughly the same skill sets they have now, and with unions to bargain for them, in sustainable energy industries. Bernie's also talking about balancing the tax burden so it's not on the backs of working and middle-income people, but so the rich pay their fair share same as the rest of us do—and you can send your kids to college without beggaring your family for the next two generations.

I'm not suggesting Bernie should've challenged Biden in 2024, because he's even OLDER than Old Joe! But his ideas still work with younger political leaders like AOC (who was too young to run for President anyway in 2024!) or Hakeem Jeffries, and they seem eager to carry the torch and break away from the kind of "Corporate NeoLiberalism" that Chuck Schumer, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Nancy Pelosi are responsible for, that DOES feel all smug and elitist, and like it uses socially liberal causes as a quickly-discarded figleaf for their own support of corporate greed—I haven't forgotten Pelosi crushed a bill that would prevent members of Congress from insider trading based on information they learned while in office!

You don't need a Ph.D. in Physics or Astronomy or Engineering to set up solar cells or a wind farm—anybody who's worked in construction can do that! You sure don't need an advanced degree to make a home more energy efficient when 90% of that is sealing windows and doors against outside weather, using glass blocks to provide light and insulation in basements, and installing a heat pump instead of a boiler. These are all jobs working income people can do well, and they don't require propping up a system that's unsustainable both for the environment and for itself, because that oil and coal isn't going to last forever.

Pro-labor Progressivism CAN work if it's allowed to, but the Democratic Party has turned into the party of Corporate Elites and their Corporate Media Lapdogs who hang out at Davos(!) and attend "Global Environmental Symposiums" in Dubai(!!!) and proudly call themselves "Hillary Liberals"(!!!!!!!!!!!-I'm running out of exclamation points here). Basically, I just used how Columbia School of Journalism and NeoLiberal Toady Jeff Jarvis describes himself—he might be even more odious than Trump himself in his smug, entitled way of talking about "how the world is".

Supporting working-income people and unions is Progressivism, and so is racial equality—and it's not a "one or the other" kind of thing, either, unless like Democrats of the last forty years you insist on MAKING it so!

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts